Analytics

Comparative performance across the fleet — trends, benchmarks by OEM / EMS / chemistry, and where the money is being lost.

All owners8 sites · 230 MW

Benchmark comparison

Same fleet, sliced by dimension — proves the read is OEM- and EMS-agnostic

OEMAvailabilityvs fleetAvail vs guaranteedRTE vs warrantedCycle burnRevenue vs planExposure
CATL98.5%
+0.5 pts+1.0 pts99%+$260K-$830K
BYD97.5%
-0.5 pts+0.9 pts93%-$480K-$480K

Cycle burn by site

Cumulative throughput this contract year, per asset

SMT Rio Grande II93%
270 / 700 cycles
SMT Harlingen II96%
280 / 700 cycles
SMT Bay City141%
412 / 700 cycles
SMT Houston IV98%
285 / 700 cycles
SMT Dallas III72%
210 / 700 cycles
SMT Corpus89%
260 / 700 cycles
SMT Dallas95%
278 / 700 cycles
SMT Laredo97%
282 / 700 cycles