SMT Laredo

10 MW / 20 MWh · CATL · Wartsila · COD 2025

HealthyOnline ERCOTSMT Laredo LLC
SOH vs warranty floor
94.6%
4.6 pts above the 90% floor
Cycles used YTD
282/700
Projected ~677 /yr · 418 cycles headroom
Availability vs guarantee
0.1pts
98.1%
this settlement period vs 98% guarantee
$ at risk on this site
$0
No open exposures on this site

Period comparison

The reason is the point, not the delta

-3.0 ptsworse
This week49.7%Last week52.7%

SOC down 3.02 pts vs last week.

Availability analytics

Click any day for root cause, forecast and revenue impact

Event intelligence
PlannedMay 18 – May 19 · 2d · inspection-0.7 ptsvs normal
Lowest that day
97.3%
Normal 98.0%
Below guarantee
2d
under 98% line
Revenue impact
$0
No penalty crystallised
What happened

No penalty — planned downtime: a scheduled transformer inspection took the asset offline inside the contractual allowance; it returned to service on completion.

Predictive analysis

Inspection complete, asset back in service; no follow-on availability risk.

Recommended action

No action required — planned maintenance inside the contractual allowance.

Recommendations for this site

Plain English, ranked by impact

  1. No open actions in this scope.

Contract position

Money-attached, each figure carries its evidence

Warranty envelope (cycles)
418 cycles headroom · 9 yrs term remaining
282 / 700
Availability vs guarantee
+0.1 pts vs 98% guarantee
98.1%
RTE vs warranted
+0.5 pts vs 85% warranted
85.5%

Warranty floor trajectory

Measured SOH vs warranted curve vs the contract floor

Above floor through the horizon
Measured SOH
Projected
Warranted curve
Floor 90%

Open alerts

0 current open findings on this site

Full queue →
No open alerts on this site.

Digital twin

Container and rack severity · click a flagged rack to open its finding

CriticalWarningWinnerHealthy
20 MWh · 10 racksAll racks nominal

Rack-level view, kept shallow by design. B9 stays at the contractual and financial layer, not cell diagnostics.